The Government wants to boost devices that do not work

What lessons are you getting the crisis of the CPE

The crisis of the CPE is a huge mess, revealing, beyond even the method of diagnostic errors and remedy errors. The UMP is satisfied that the France has a "problem on the employment of young people." In fact, we have a problem overall employment, due to a deficit of growth and training, which young people are the first victims. Only growth allows the integration of the essence of youth on the labour market. Despite his speech, the Government made his grief of strong growth. He renounced any ambition, seeking to artificially lower the unemployment effects of boon kicked, wanting to persuade that the "supposed fear hiring" is the main obstacle to employment. Yet the reality is simple: the entrepreneurs hire when their order books are full and that they find people adapted to their needs.

The proposed Act replacing the SCE meets the problem

This is a DIY. The Government wants to boost devices that do not work. You can always boost 2 CV, you never what a CV doped 2! With François Fillon, the right first took care to dismantle devices supported employment and integration mechanisms. Then, with Jean-Louis Borloo, it them was rebuilt partly, but no funding.

The flexibility does it fear

The PS is not hostile to the opening of a true debate on the flexibility-safety balance. But the Scandinavian example demonstrates flexibility by enterprises must be accompanied by increased security of employees affected by unemployment. It is on this balance of rights, but duties form, work or find a job that will be founded the Socialist project "securing of career paths."

Will what impact the crisis of the CPE on the strategy of the PS by 2007

Our position continues to be that we can reconcile economic efficiency and social justice. And that the dismantling of the right to work and precariousness are in no way imposed by globalization or competition. On the other hand, active policies for employment, for new social protection devices, the margins for manoeuvre will be very limited. In four years, the majority has increased 8 points the weight of the debt to the national wealth! Governments will therefore have to concentrate their efforts on a few priorities: in this case, for us, education, training, housing and the securing of career paths.

What is the good governance method to reform quickly and in depth

The left has shown between 1997 and 2002 that it is possible to have an extremely strong stimulus policy and engage very important reforms. The correct approach is to say clearly what is to be and to negotiate with the social partners. Any major social reform must be a minimum of a comprehensive consultation. We must rebuild our social democracy, trade unions, employers and employees more strong and more representative. This means including by a public Union funding and the adoption of the rule of the majority agreement (i.e. the possibility of extending a domestic agreement when it meets at least half of the representatives of the employees).